By Greg Penglis and Grok AI, September 29, 2025
INTRODUCTION:
One of the worst laws, along with Big Pharma vaccine liability immunity, is the PREP Act. PREP stands for
“Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.”
Sounds good. But this Act is the ultimate government/medical/high tech/industrial/media, guarantee that they will never be responsible for anything, no matter how many people die, how many are crippled, how many are poisoned, how many are affected, how many close to those are affected, nor will they suffer any legal or financial consequence for anything they do, no matter how deadly their policies or how false their information and propaganda, because this is the ultimate legal escape. That’s why I wrote a bill to repeal it, and the Emergency Use Authorizations that came from it, so that no such further laws, regulations, policies, or mandates, can ever be imposed again. Unless of course this law is changed. Big mistake.
The Brownstone Institute said in an article here:
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-prep-act-swallowed-the-bill-of-rights
“The US sold its citizens’ right to jury trials to the country’s largest lobbying force, and Americans now bear the costs after Pharma cashed record profits.
The PREP Act, a 2005 statute invoked by HHS Secretary Alex Azar at the onset of the pandemic, guarantees immunity “with respect to all claims caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure,” including mRNA vaccines.
In effect, this serves as a “get-out-of-jail free card for anyone connected with the Covid shots,” as Alex Berenson explains in his recent reporting. While Covid products earned Pfizer over $50 billion in 2022, the PREP Act bars Americans from suing from injuries or medical misconduct related to the broad definition of “covered countermeasures.’”
Dr. Robert Malone at his Malone Institute said this about the PREP Act.
https://maloneinstitute.org/blog/prep-act-reform
“The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) is a U.S. federal law passed in 2005. It allows the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to issue declarations that provide broad immunity from liability for developing, manufacturing, distributing, administering, and using medical countermeasures during public health emergencies. The goal of the law is to encourage a quick response to health threats like pandemics or bioterrorism by reducing the risk of lawsuits for those involved in creating and deploying critical medical countermeasure products.
The PREP Act was passed in response to concerns that fear of lawsuits was discouraging pharmaceutical companies from developing vaccines and other critical medical products for emergencies. Another action taken to entice big Pharma was the notorious “Other Transactional Authority” (OTA) process that functionally bypasses the Federal Acquisition Regulations. OTA was used extensively during the federal COVID response, including for the development and acquisition of the mRNA countermeasure products.
At least one aspect of the PREP Act was designed by big pharma to bypass critical FDA pre-licensure infrastructure.
The PREP Act is what has allowed the US government to pay out almost nothing in damages to people injured from the COVID-19 vaccines.”
What happened during the government Covid oppression was a medical holocaust. Every constitutional right was violated under the guise of an “emergency,” even though the guarantee of the Constitution is that it is ALWAYS fully in force, regardless of any emergency, and especially during an emergency. The Constitution and Bill of Rights weren’t written to protect us from good government, because that isn’t necessary. It is written to protect us from bad government. Or in the case of 2020, an illegal, Coup d’Etat government.
Things were so bad, that the cures for Covid, FDA approved for decades, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, were banned by the Emergency Use Authorization, and substituted for them were the experimental, untested, unproven, radically new technology mRNA, so-called “vaccines,” that killed people, created mutations, and gave people Covid. But that’s ok, because the PREP Act made them immune from liability… The fact that laws on the books prohibited experimental therapies when existing ones cured the disease and killed the virus, were not going to get in the way of the “Plandemic” banning the approved cures and mandating the experimental death concoctions.
And then we were failed by every check and balance written into the system. The Congress refused to regulate and stop the gov’t health, Big Pharma, High Tech, Leftist media, global UN, industrial complex. The courts who are all too willing to stop Trump’s legal and necessary powers and actions now, refused to stop all the illegal actions of the executive health and human service agencies then, nor to protect our rights. The governors except for Kristi Noam in South Dakota who never shut down or required any mandates, all the rest to some measure banned, closed, refused a cure, or took away our freedoms and rights under color of law and gunpoint. The mayors shirked their duties, as did all the city councils and county governments. There was a complete abdication of upholding the law and protecting the citizens. Even the churches let themselves be closed. And so of course millions of people died, were killed by their hospital protocols which were wrong, dropped dead from the Covid shot, lost businesses, kids lost schooling, and overall everyone lost something because of illegal government policies and their enforcement. I lost two close friends who were killed by government.
Government employees made money from licensing and patenting their work for We the People, and made a fortune. Trillions of dollars of fraud and death were spread out across this country as every step, from the PCR Covid test which doesn’t work, to the fraudulent death certificates listing Covid as the cause of death when it was a motorcycle accident (true story) or something completely unrelated to Covid, just to get the Covid commissions. Each death caused by gov’t and hospital policy could be worth some $500,000 or more. Money for murder, and it was policy.
And no one who could stepped up to stop this…
So, I did going forward from here. This bill written with Grok AI reverses and repeals everything from the PREP Act and the associated Emergency Use Authorizations. It guarantees our rights regardless of the crisis or emergency, and prevents any such program or event ever happening like this again.
The only question is whether you, yes YOU, will share the bill until it becomes national news, and Congress is pressured on pain of losing their next election, to pass this bill. I wrote it. You get it passed.
A BILL
To protect individual constitutional rights, including freedoms of assembly and religion, and personal safety during public health emergencies by repealing the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, revoking specific emergency use authorization declarations, repealing emergency use authorization authority, prohibiting the suspension of constitutional protections, prohibiting the banning of approved drugs or therapies, defining the public interest as the sum of individual decisions, and revoking conflicting emergency authorities.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Constitutional Protections and Individual Safety in Emergencies Act.”
SECTION 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights are the supreme law of the land and must remain fully in force during any declared emergency, regardless of severity, to protect individual liberties and safety, including the First Amendment rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of religion.
(2) Individual rights, choice, and safety in all medical decisions, including the refusal of medical interventions, are the sole responsibility and authority of the individual. The public interest shall be defined solely as the sum total of all individual decisions, free from any Federal, State, or local government coercion, restriction, withholding of information, censorship, or any method of enforcement. No such government shall use “the public interest,” or any similar term, to justify any violation of individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the Bill of Rights.
(3) The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d) has enabled liability exemptions and coercive measures that undermine individual consent and accountability, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(4) Historical government actions during public health emergencies, including mandates for experimental medical products and closures of churches, clubs, restaurants, and other gathering places under the guise of public health measures like social distancing, have in some instances caused harm exceeding the risks of the underlying health threat, necessitating robust protections for individual rights.
(5) No emergency declaration should suspend constitutional protections, including but not limited to freedom of speech, religion, assembly, movement, the right to keep and bear arms, due process, equal protection, or the right to refuse medical treatment.
(6) The Emergency Use Authorization declaration for COVID-19 countermeasures, issued under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, enabled unaccountable deployment of experimental products, necessitating its revocation and the repeal of emergency use authorization authority to protect individual rights and safety.
SECTION 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC READINESS AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (PREP) ACT.
Section 319F–3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d) is repealed.
SECTION 4. REVOCATION OF EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION DECLARATIONS AND REPEAL OF EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORITY.
(a) Revocation of COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization Declaration.— The Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19, issued on March 27, 2020, and published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2020 (85 FR 18241), including all amendments and extensions thereto, is revoked upon the date of enactment. No further actions, authorizations, or liabilities under such Declaration shall have any force or effect.
(b) Repeal of Emergency Use Authorization Authority.— Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3) is repealed.
(c) Prohibition on Future Emergency Use Authorizations.— No Federal agency, department, or instrumentality, including the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Food and Drug Administration, shall issue, authorize, or enforce any emergency use authorization, declaration, or similar order for unapproved medical products during any public health emergency, whether under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act, or any other provision of law. All medical products must receive full approval under applicable statutes prior to distribution or administration.
SECTION 5. ADDITION OF NEW SECTION TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.
Title 42, Chapter 6A of the United States Code is amended by adding after section 319F–3 (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d) the following new section:
§ 247d–6e. Prohibition on Suspension of Constitutional Rights During Public Health Emergencies
(a) General Prohibition.— No Federal, State, or local government, agency, department, or instrumentality, under any emergency declaration, authority, or law (including but not limited to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d)), shall enact, enforce, or promulgate any law, regulation, mandate, order, or policy that—
(1) suspends, restricts, or infringes upon any right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the Bill of Rights, including but not limited to—
(A) the freedom of speech, religion, or assembly under the First Amendment, including the right to gather in churches, religious institutions, clubs, restaurants, or other public or private venues for worship, social, or civic purposes;
(B) the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment;
(C) the right to due process or equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; or
(D) the right to refuse medical treatment;
(2) mandates or compels any individual to undergo medical treatment, including vaccination, diagnostic testing, or quarantine, without voluntary, informed consent;
(3) imposes penalties, discrimination, or adverse consequences (including but not limited to termination of employment, denial of access to public or private services, facilities, or spaces, or exclusion from educational institutions) on an individual for exercising their right to refuse medical treatment or for asserting any constitutional right, including gathering for religious or social purposes;
(4) restricts, prohibits, or orders the closure of businesses, religious institutions, churches, clubs, restaurants, or other public or private gathering places, except where the owner or operator of such place explicitly consents to such restrictions; or
(5) enforces social distancing or similar public health measures that limit or prohibit the exercise of constitutional rights, including the right to assemble or practice religion.
(b) Priority of Individual Safety and Choice.— Any public health measure, whether under Federal, State, or local authority, shall prioritize the safety and autonomous decision-making of individuals over collective public health objectives. No measure shall be deemed lawful if it coerces, compels, or penalizes an individual for exercising their right to make medical or personal decisions, including the right to gather for religious, social, or civic purposes, as such coercion undermines the principle that individual safety constitutes public safety.
(c) Informed Consent Requirement.—
(1) Consistent with section 564(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)), for any medical product, including those authorized prior to the repeal of section 564, individuals shall be provided, in writing and in sufficient time prior to administration, comprehensive information regarding—
(A) the product’s risks, benefits, and alternatives;
(B) the right to accept or refuse administration of the product without penalty or adverse consequences; and
(C) any experimental or emergency use status of the product.
(2) No individual shall be administered such a product without providing written, voluntary consent, and no Federal, State, or local government or private entity receiving Federal funds shall impose any consequence for refusal.
(d) Enforcement.—
(1) Any individual whose rights under this section are violated may bring a civil action in a United States district court for injunctive relief, damages, or other appropriate remedies.
(2) No immunity, including under any emergency authority, shall apply to any Federal, State, or local official or entity violating this section.
(e) Preemption.— No Federal, State, or local law, regulation, or policy, including any emergency declaration, shall preempt or supersede the protections established in this section.
(f) Prohibition on Misuse of Public Interest.— No Federal, State, or local government, agency, department, or instrumentality shall use the term “public interest,” or any similar term, to justify any law, regulation, mandate, order, or policy that violates individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the Bill of Rights, including but not limited to freedoms of speech, religion, assembly, movement, or the right to refuse medical treatment. The public interest shall be defined solely as the sum total of all individual decisions, free from any government coercion, restriction, withholding of information, censorship, or method of enforcement. Individual rights, choice, and safety in all medical decisions, including the refusal of medical interventions, are the sole responsibility and authority of the individual.
(g) Prohibition on Banning or Suspending Approved Drugs or Therapies During Emergencies.—
(1) No Federal, State, or local government, agency, department, or instrumentality, under any emergency declaration, authority, or law (including but not limited to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d)), shall ban, suspend, restrict, or otherwise interfere with the use, distribution, or access to any drug, biological product, or medical therapy that has been approved or licensed by the Food and Drug Administration prior to the declaration of such emergency, including off-label uses consistent with established medical practice.
(2) Consistent with section 564(c)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3(c)(3)), no emergency use authorization may be issued for any unapproved product if an adequate, approved, and available alternative exists for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition involved. During any public health emergency, the availability of approved alternatives shall be presumed sufficient unless affirmatively demonstrated otherwise by clear and convincing evidence in a public proceeding.
(3) Any violation of this subsection shall be subject to the enforcement provisions of subsection (d).
SECTION 6. TERMINATION OF EXISTING EMERGENCY AUTHORITIES.
(a) Termination of Contracts and Obligations.— Any existing contracts, grants, or obligations under section 319F–3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d) or any other emergency authority related to medical countermeasures shall terminate upon the date of enactment, with no further Federal payments authorized.
(b) Revocation of Conflicting Emergency Declarations.— Any declaration issued under the following provisions of the United States Code that conflicts with this Act is revoked upon the date of enactment:
(1) Section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), relating to public health emergencies.
(2) Section 319F–1 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6), relating to targeted liability protections for medical countermeasures.
(3) Section 1135 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5), relating to waivers of Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP requirements during emergencies.
(4) Sections 201 and 301 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), relating to major disaster and emergency declarations.
(5) Section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4558), relating to voluntary agreements for emergency preparedness.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment and apply to all actions, declarations, and obligations commencing on or after such date.
ENDORSEMENTS:
BILL STATUS:
COMMENTS: